VIDEO What really happened at the Wuhan lab? – Is Aspirin the Real COVID Wonder Drug? – Medical Errors – Strip MD license? – NIH website: Ivermectin as COVID treatment – NIH Corrects False Statements by Collins and Fauci 

Chuck Norris asks if the Chinese military is playing biological warfare games

October 18, 2021

In nine seasons as “Walker, Texas Ranger,” I investigated hundreds and hundreds of crimes. If I were still filming the show, this crime would take the cake.

Despite being 18 months into the coronavirus pandemic, we the people still don’t know the origins of it. But I don’t believe for a minute someone in the U.S. government doesn’t know. It’s high time for Mr. Biden and other U.S. officials to come clean and settle this matter with the American public.

Most discussions regarding the origins of the coronavirus center around China’s Wuhan Institute of Virology, which is strangely and highly protected by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention as well as the World Health Organization.

Speculations about the inception of SARS-CoV-2 at the Wuhan lab are well founded and documented. Here are just a few facts we know:

Australian virologist Danielle Anderson was the only foreign scientist (the world is aware of) that had undertaken research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology’s BSL-4 lab. She arrived in 2016 and left the facility in November 2019 right at the time of the outbreak. I don’t know what shuttled her away at such a perfect time, but it seems as choreographed as other covert elements of this Chinese viral saga.

Being there only three short years, Bloomberg News reported that Anderson said, “Entering and exiting the facility was a carefully choreographed endeavor. … Departures were made especially intricate by a requirement to take both a chemical shower and a personal shower – the timings of which were precisely planned.”

Though Anderson doesn’t subscribe to malicious intent origins, she said the Wuhan lab is so large that she didn’t know what everyone was working on at the end of 2019. She also confessed that if presented with evidence, she “could foresee how things could maybe happen. I’m not naive enough to say I absolutely write this off.”

She also conceded that “it would be theoretically possible for a scientist in the lab to be working on a gain of function technique [i.e. genetically manipulating a virus to give it new functions] to unknowingly infect themselves and to then unintentionally infect others in the community.”

Her personal conclusion was that: “The pandemic is something no one could have imagined on this scale,” but then confesses again: “The virus was in the right place at the right time, and everything lined up to cause this disaster.” “Everything lined up” by chance? By itself?

Could such “perfect timing and orchestration” be far more than an accident or coincidence? Is there an agency that could have caused it? According to China’s most famous political prisoner and defector, Wei Jinsheng, who is still in touch with top governing insiders in the Communist country, the Chinese military has sinister plans afoot.

In the must-read amazing and insightful new book and exposé, “What Really Happened in Wuhan?” by the award-winning Australian investigative journalist Sharri Markson, Wei Jinsheng is just one of many Chinese whistleblowers who unveil the Communist COVID-19 plot. He even warned U.S. intelligence and political officials about the coronavirus in October 2019, but received no response.

In Chapter 21, titled “Military Games,” Markson explained: “Wei, a former Communist Party insider from one of the 500 founding families, is a seven-time nominee for the Nobel Peace Prize and the winner of the Robert F. Kennedy Memorial Human Rights Award, the European Parliament’s Sakharov Prize for Freedom of Thought, the U.S. National Endowment for Democracy Award and Sweden’s Olof Palme Memorial Prize … Known as the godfather of the [Chinese] Democracy Movement, Wei’s voice is credible and he deserves to be heard.”

Wei explained, “In September [18th] 2019, the Chinese government held a large-scale ‘anti-coronavirus exercise’ in the airport and hospitals of Wuhan, which was equivalent to a military exercise. … The exercise included epidemiological investigation, medical investigation and temporary quarantine.”

“In Wei’s opinion, it’s possible there was a deliberate release of the coronavirus during the [October 2019] Military World Games to test the biological warfare, and send the virus back around the world through the visiting athletes.” (This is same month that U.S. satellite surveillance images captured all the Wuhan hospitals’ parking being overwhelmed to capacity!)

Wei is not alone in his Chinese suspicion. In June of this year, many Republican members of the U.S. Congress launched their own investigation.

The Washington Post reported, “More than 9,000 international athletes from more than 100 countries traveled to Wuhan, China – and many of them later got sick with COVID-19-like symptoms. But there has never been a real investigation into whether the virus that causes COVID-19 was already spreading at the Wuhan Military World Games. Now, multiple U.S. lawmakers are demanding the U.S. government begin one.”

“The State Department’s only consideration of the Wuhan Military World Games came when the Chinese foreign ministry began citing the event in its own propaganda in March 2020. The Chinese asserted that U.S. Army personnel might have brought the virus to Wuhan from Fort Detrick in Frederick, Md., where the U.S. Army bioresearch program is based. That didn’t make sense because the first outbreak was in Wuhan, not Maryland. …”

“We were aware in the administration of the Chinese government’s misinformation campaign accusing the U.S. military of bringing covid to Wuhan at those games, which obviously we didn’t take seriously and didn’t consider to be a good-faith effort to get to the bottom of it,” David Feith, a former State Department official said. “To the extent there are now or there were all along credible reports of sick athletes from those games, we should certainly chase them down and learn more.”

“If the Biden administration is as serious as it claims to be regarding investigating the pandemic’s origins, it must go back and test all the U.S. military personnel who were in Wuhan for antibodies and then attempt to trace any outbreaks that might have come from their trip to the games. Other countries with athletes who got sick must do the same. It’s true, the value of the data may have waned over time, because antibodies dissipate and tracing is more difficult. But it’s still worth trying, and there’s no honest argument for ignoring this issue.”

Investigative journalist Markson asked, “What would be the motive for such [a Chinese military viral] attack?” Defector Wei answered: “If everything goes well without being discovered, then in the future, they can engage in vaccine diplomacy, expand the circle of friends and fight against the West.”

In September 2020, Nature documented “China’s coronavirus vaccine shows military’s growing role in medical research“: “The largest armed force in the world, China’s People’s Liberation Army (PLA), is not known for its cutting edge medical research. But since 2015, it has ramped up recruitment of scientists, and investment in the field as part of its strategy to modernize its military. Now, the coronavirus pandemic is showcasing the PLA’s growing expertise in medical research, including a major role in developing the coronavirus vaccine that was the first in the world to be approved for restricted use.”

The Halloween nightmare in the Wuhan chronicles is that the U.S. has also been funding China’s gain of function research on the coronavirus for years through the National Institute of Health, and therefore (as hard as it is to hear) enabled the creation of the global pandemic. Richard Ebright, board of governors professor of chemistry and chemical biology at Rutgers University and laboratory director at the Waksman Institute of Microbiology, recently confirmed this fact to Newsweek as “unequivocally” true – something Dr. Anthony Fauci denied (and therefore lied) before Congress.

If you’re ready to go further down the Wuhan rabbit hole, I encourage you to watch Sky News Australia’s hour-long special investigation with Sharri Markson, who interviews former President Trump and U.S. intelligence about their thoughts on the lab as well. Also, please read The Intercept’s recent full investigative report, “NIH Documents Provide New Evidence U.S. Funded Gain-of-Function Research in Wuhan.”

There’s one thing I know: It’s only a matter of time before the Wuhan smoking gun is found. We should pray that it is discovered before another viral shot is fired from the Chinese chamber, with even more devastating and disastrous national or global effects.

As satirist Douglas Adams said, “If it looks like a duck, and quacks like a duck, we have at least to consider the possibility that we have a small aquatic bird of the family anatidae on our hands.”

STUDY: Is Aspirin the Real COVID Wonder Drug?

‘The team investigated more than 400 COVID patients from hospitals across the United States who take aspirin unrelated to their COVID disease…’ByJohn RansomOctober 14, 2021

Aspirin / IMAGE: ABC News

A new study following up on Israeli research suggests that the most successful drug ever discovered, aspirin, may also be helpful against COVID-19 says the Jerusalem Post.

“The team investigated more than 400 COVID patients from hospitals across the United States who take aspirin unrelated to their COVID disease,” said

It “found that the treatment reduced the risk of several parameters by almost half: reaching mechanical ventilation by 44%, ICU admissions by 43%, and overall in-hospital mortality by 47.”

The study from the George Washington University helped substantiate a previous study conducted by Israeli researchers in March.

The Israeli study looked at people who were already taking low doses of aspirin to reduce the risk of heart disease and found that aspirin users “had a 29% lower risk of contracting COVID-19 compared to those who didn’t take aspirin, and that rates of aspirin use were much lower among COVID-19 patients than among those who didn’t get infected,” said a WebMD summary of the study.

Some people are already bracing for a push-back from the medical community on the studies.

New reports this week have downplayed aspirin’s effectiveness in combating a first heart attack and raised new worries about bleeding amongst users.

Aspirin is widely used as an anti-inflammatory medicine and also to prevent blood clots—both of which are complicit in COVID.

That said, the studies are just preliminary findings that can be used to generate hypotheses about the mechanism of action aspirin has with COVID. Further research is need.

WebMD said the study doesn’t provide cause and effect, but only associations between aspirin and lower COVID rates. The lower rates could be caused by other factors not known.

And aspirin, while widely tolerated, isn’t without risks.

“Aspirin, while having a substantial effect on reducing blood clots, can also cause bleeding disorders and stomach ulcers and has harmful side effects on patients to whom the treatment is not indicated,” says “Be advised that new treatments should never be started without consulting a healthcare provider.”

STUDY: Is Aspirin the Real COVID Wonder Drug?

Medical associations back stripping licenses from doctors who warn against COVID-19 jabs

The American Board of Pediatrics, American Board of Family Medicine, and American Board of Internal Medicine support the Federation of State Medical Boards’ decision that all boards should revoke or suspend the license and certification of doctors who question the safety of the experimental COVID-19 jabs. 

Featured Image

Jack Bingham Sep 20, 2021

WASHINGTON, D.C. (LifeSiteNews) – Three professional medical associations have backed a bid to strip doctors who speak out against the novel COVID-19 inoculations of their ability to practice medicine. 

On Thursday, September 9, the American Board of Pediatrics, the American Board of Family Medicine, and the American Board of Internal Medicine released a joint statement supporting the Federation of State Medical Boards’ (FSMB) July 29 decision that all boards should revoke or suspend the license and certification of doctors who question the safety of the experimental COVID-19 jabs. 

“We at the American Board of Family Medicine (ABFM), the American Board of Internal Medicine (ABIM), and the American Board of Pediatrics (ABP) support FSMB’s position. We also want all physicians certified by our Boards to know that such unethical or unprofessional conduct may prompt their respective Board to take action that could put their certification at risk,” the three boards wrote in their statement.  

The Federation of State Medical Boards (FSMB) – a national organization representing all American medical boards that license and discipline physicians, including the ABFM, ABIM, and ABP, released their now supported position in a statement published on July 29

“Physicians who generate and spread COVID-19 vaccine misinformation or disinformation are risking disciplinary action by state medical boards, including the suspension or revocation of their medical license,” reads the FSMB’s release. 

“Due to their specialized knowledge and training, licensed physicians possess a high degree of public trust and therefore have a powerful platform in society, whether they recognize it or not. They also have an ethical and professional responsibility to practice medicine in the best interests of their patients and must share information that is factual, scientifically grounded and consensus-driven for the betterment of public health,” they added. 

According to the FSMB the new disciplinary directives are necessary because of the “dramatic increase” of physicians disseminating “COVID-19 vaccine misinformation.” 

“Consensus-driven” science, as mentioned in the statement, is at odds with the scientific method, which encourages debate and dissenting evidence as a way of discovering objective scientific truth. 

According to Purdue University, “The scientific method requires that a hypothesis be ruled out or modified if its predictions are clearly and repeatedly incompatible with experimental tests.” 

“The most fundamental error is to mistake the hypothesis for an explanation of a phenomenon without performing experimental tests and following all the steps outlined above. Another is to ignore or rule out data that do not support the hypothesis,” Purdue continues.  

The American Board of Pediatrics currently has 71,000 board certified members. The American Board of Family Medicine has 97,000 members, and the American Board of Internal Medicine has 289,000 members. 

As co-signers of the FSMB statement, they have declared to hundreds of thousands of American doctors that they are at risk of licensure suspension or revocation, and having their board certification rescinded, if they warn their patients about the potential risks of receiving the jab, or if they present any evidence that goes against the purported “consensus.”  

In effect, if these doctors want to uphold the scientific method, which encourages challenging the status quo, they risk serious and potentially career-ending discipline.  

The vaccines, which do not complete clinical trials until 2023, have been linked to a myriad of conditions, including but not limited to myocarditis and pericarditis, blood clots, capillary leak syndrome, irregular menstrual cycles in women, fertility issues, anaphylaxis, autoimmune conditions, paralysis, cancer, and death.  

Most concerning is the American Board of Pediatrics, whose doctors oversee the health of millions of American children, and who have now barred their doctors from warning parents that these experimental and scientifically unnecessary injections, may pose a serious risk to their children’s health and safety.  

“There is zero benefit to children from the vaccine,” said Paul Elias Alexander, PhD, a former senior adviser to COVID pandemic policy in the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). 

“If children are infected with the virus, they are typically asymptomatic, and the disease is very mild and non-consequential,” he continued.  

“However, the potential harm from vaccines is severe. Just look at the cases of myocarditis and pericarditis that have emerged in our teens, especially boys, due to the vaccines.”  

Alexander’s statements are backed by data from the American Academy of Pediatrics, which has stated that the risk of death for children from COVID-19 is 0.00 – 0.003 percent. For comparison, that is in the same reference range as dying from a dog attack, cataclysmic storm, or lightning strike

Additionally, myocarditis and pericarditis, potentially fatal heart inflammation conditions that the FDA admits are potential adverse effects to the jab, occur at a rate 32 times higher than expected for boys aged 12-17, and 27 times higher than expected for young men aged 18-24. 

The injections, which were all created with the aid of cell-lines derived from an aborted baby, have been linked to a conservative estimate of 5,000 deaths in America alone, as well as 21,000 deaths in the European Union. 

“Informed consent has been disregarded and medical necessity is not considered. Therefore, young and healthy people and those who already have antibodies are still being forced into an experimental medical intervention that they do not need,” said Dr. Vladmir Zelenko, a physician who has been nominated for a Nobel Peace Prize regarding his work in the treatment for COVID-19. 

“These [vaccine coercers] are criminals of the highest order and must be brought to justice for crimes against humanity.” 

NIH website features much-maligned ivermectin as COVID treatment

Drug listed 2nd only to expensive government favorite remdesivir

By Art Moore October 19, 2021

Doctors are being barred from prescribing ivermectin to their COVID-19 patients, and the Food and Drug Administration has joined media in mocking users, but the antiviral drug is featured on the National Institutes of Health website as a treatment for COVID-19.

In fact, ivermectin is the second drug listed – under the highly touted, expensive COVID-19 drug with many side effects, remdesivir – on an NIH page titled “Antiviral Agents That Are Approved or Under Evaluation for the Treatment of COVID-19.”

Ivermectin has not been approved by the FDA as a COVID-19 treatment. But it is approved by the FDA for other treatments and has been successfully used off-label for COVID-19 patients. From 10% to 20% of all prescribed drugs are used off-label. Ivermectin has been shown to be effective in an least 65 controlled studies and 32 randomized controlled trials as a preventative and early- and late-stage treatment. Studies have demonstrated its ability to inhibit the replication of SARS-CoV-2 as well as its strong anti-inflammatory properties.

But doctors and pharmacists have disclosed that health-care management is barring them from prescribing ivermectin. And the drug recently was the target of a media and government disinformation campaign, dismissing it disingenuously as “horse dewormer.” The FDA’s official Twitter account posted a caption above a photo of a horse: “You are not a horse. You are not a cow. Seriously, y’all. Stop it.”

NIH points out on its “antiviral agents” page that among the serious side effects seen in patients who take remdesivir are severe renal failure and liver damage. Ivermectin, on the other hand, is “generally well tolerated.”

However, remdesivir is currently the only drug with full FDA approval to treat COVID-19. Merck, the producer of ivermectin, applied earlier this month for emergency use authorization for a new COVID-19 treatment called molnupirivar. The federal government already has a $1.2 billion contract with Merck to buy molnupiravir at $700 per 10-pill course. Remdesivir costs $2,340 for a five-day course. Ivermectin can be purchased for about $50 for eight generic tablets.

The World Health Organization, in November 2020, recommended against the use of remdesivir in hospitalized COVID-19 patients.

The WHO said at the time that there was “no evidence that remdesivir improves survival and other outcomes in these patients.”

Prior to the FDA’s emergency use authorization of remdesivir to treat COVID-19, it was studied as a potential treatment for several diseases, including hepatitis. NIH invested as much as $6.5 billion in the drug between 2000 and 2019.

Ivermectin, whose inventors won a Nobel Prize, has a better safety record than several vitamins, with an average of only 160 adverse events reported every year. It has been safely administered several billion times around the world, virtually eradicating diseases such as river blindness in Africa.

The side effects observed, according to the NIH, include “dizziness”; “pruritis,” which is an irritating sensation that creates an urge to scratch; nausea and diarrhea. The NIH said unspecified “neurological” adverse effects have been seen in the treatment of parasitic disease, but it’s unclear if they are connected to the drug or to the underlying conditions.

Dr. Bryan Ardis recently drew attention to ivermectin’s status on the NIH website in an interview on the Canadian podcast “Live with Laura-Lynn.”

In September, more than 8,600 scientists and physicians from around the world signed a declaration condemning public policy makers of “crimes against humanity” for restricting life-saving treatments such as ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine while quashing debate and scientific inquiry.

EDITOR’S NOTE: Last year, America’s doctors, nurses and paramedics were celebrated as frontline heroes battling a fearsome new pandemic. Today, under Joe Biden, tens of thousands of these same heroes are denounced as rebels, conspiracy theorists, extremists and potential terrorists. Along with massive numbers of police, firemen, Border Patrol agents, Navy SEALs, pilots, air-traffic controllers, and countless other truly essential Americans, they’re all considered so dangerous as to merit termination, their professional and personal lives turned upside down due to their decision not to be injected with the experimental COVID vaccines. Biden’s tyrannical mandate threatens to cripple American society – from law enforcement to airlines to commercial supply chains to hospitals. It’s already happening. But the good news is that huge numbers of “yesterday’s heroes” are now fighting back – bravely and boldly. The whole epic showdown is laid out as never before in the sensational October issue of WND’s monthly Whistleblower magazine, titled “THE GREAT AMERICAN REBELLION: ‘We will not comply!’ COVID-19 power grab ignites bold new era of national defiance.”

BREAKING: NIH Today Corrects False Statements by Directors Collins and Fauci – the NIH Did Fund Gain-of-Function Research in Wuhan

By Joe Hoft October 20, 2021

NIH Director Collins and NIAID Director Fauci both claimed that the NIH had not funded the gain-of-function research in Wuhan.  Today we found out they lied. 

Dr. Fauci, the Director of NIAID, was under oath when speaking with Senator Rand Paul.  He denied that the NIH funded the gain-of-function research in Wuhan.

Today the NIH provided a document to the US House of Representatives that claims that the NIH did fund gain-of-function research in Wuhan.

It looks like doctors Fauci and Collins are caught and are in trouble. 

Medical Errors: The Third Leading Cause of Death in the United States

Faulty Premises and Medical Errors in Children


Author: Narrow Path Ministries

Non-denominational, Independent, Bible believing Church

4 thoughts on “VIDEO What really happened at the Wuhan lab? – Is Aspirin the Real COVID Wonder Drug? – Medical Errors – Strip MD license? – NIH website: Ivermectin as COVID treatment – NIH Corrects False Statements by Collins and Fauci ”

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s