There was a huge win for the Constitutional right to freedom of religion on Friday.
The Louisiana Supreme Court sided today in favor of Pastor Tony Spell who continued to hold church services in defiance of Dr. Tony Fauci and Governor John Bel Edwards during the COVID pandemic in the spring of 2020.
Dr. Fauci urged state leaders to place significant restrictions on US churches to stop the spread of the Coronavirus.
The Louisiana Supreme Court ruled that the restrictions on gatherings and the stay-at-home mandate Edwards imposed were unconstitutional as they applied to Spell. The ordered charges against Pastor Spell to be dropped.
Here is the Louisiana Supreme Court ruling released today.
Louisiana Supreme Court Sides with Pastor Tony Spell – Agrees that COVID Orders Violated His Freedom of Re… by Jim Hoft on Scribd
The Louisiana Supreme Court has ruled in favor of Tony Spell, the Central Pastor who continued to hold church services in defiance of restrictions Gov. John Bel Edwards imposed to stop the spread of COVID.
Overruling lower courts, the justices ruled that the restrictions on gatherings and the stay-at-home mandate Edwards imposed were unconstitutional as they applied to Spell. They ordered the charges against him quashed.
Justices John Weimer and Piper Griffin dissented on the ruling.
Statement from Gov. John Bel Edwards:
“While the Governor disagrees with the Court’s ruling and maintains that his orders were both necessary and lawful, he is accepting of it. Each and every action Gov. Edwards took throughout the COVID pandemic was done with the goal of protecting the public’s health and saving lives.
Hat Tip Pete Santilli
Federal Appeals Court Reinstates Texas Law Prohibiting Social Media Companies from Banning Users Based on Viewpoints
A federal appeals court on Wednesday reinstated a Texas law that prohibits social media companies from banning users based on their political views. The law will take effect immediately following the ruling.
Governor Abbott signed the new law last September 9, prohibiting the social media giants from banning users based on their political views and requiring them to produce regular reports of removed content, create a complaint system, and disclose their content regulation procedures, according to Texas Tribune.
U.S. District Judge Robert Pitman blocked the law in December after NetChoice and CCIA filed a lawsuit claiming that the law violated their right to free speech under the 1st Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. According to Judge Pitman, social media platforms are protected by the First Amendment and have the right to moderate content.
On Wednesday, a three-judge panel of the New Orleans-based Fifth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals granted a motion to stay to allow Texas to implement the law while the state’s appeal continues.
The 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals panel did not explain its reasoning for granting the state’s request for a stay of a December order by U.S. District Judge Robert Pitman in Austin, Texas, who had found that social media companies’ 1st Amendment rights would be harmed by allowing the law to take effect.
The order included a footnote that the three-judge panel, comprised of Circuit Judges Edith Jones, Leslie Southwick and Andrew Oldham, was not unanimous, though it did not say how it was divided. The judges were appointed by former Republican Presidents Ronald Reagan, George W. Bush and Donald Trump, respectively.
A lawyer for the plaintiffs challenging the law — internet lobbying groups NetChoice and the Computer & Communications Industry Association (CCIA), whose members include Twitter, Facebook and Google — did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Nor did the office of Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, which is defending the law.
NetChoice and CCIA said in their lawsuit that the law violated their right to free speech under the 1st Amendment of the U.S. Constitution by barring them from exercising editorial discretion over their private platforms.
Exclusive receipts of a USAID grant agreement from 2020 show that the federal government sent millions of taxpayer dollars in funding for abortion and population control propaganda disguised as overseas COVID-relief grants.
The grant, funneled to the notorious eugenics group Pathfinder International, appears not to be a one-off incident. Rather, it is part of a multi-million dollar federal scheme that stealthily used pandemic “disaster relief efforts” to advance population control abroad. A closer look reveals a corrupt, decades-long agenda at USAID whereby leftist elites have used taxpayer dollars to fund their ideological priorities at the expense of the American people.
Federal Grants: A Mask for Corruption
Funneling dark money through deliberately vague grants is a method USAID has used for decades to exploit world disasters and advance the globalist elite agenda. The federal grantmaking process is convoluted for a reason. It shuts the American people out from the truth about how their money is spent, and how the massive engine of government has gone rogue without their consent. Grants have become the mechanism of choice for bureaucrats to abuse their power, and use their “expertise” to ignore the everyday Americans who pay them. They are a Trojan Horse deployed by the Administrative State to divert funds to malicious activities, often under the auspices of justice and humanitarian concern.
One of these grants, obtained in its full form exclusively by Revolver, was authorized by a low-level USAID bureaucrat in July 2020 to send $500,000 to Pathfinder through a program surreptitiously named “Responding to COVID-19 in Hotspot Areas of Ethiopia.” The vague title mirrors dozens of similarly-worded grants the government disbursed to various “humanitarian” organizations which operate as fronts for population control and other globalist priorities.
Scant details on grants like this can be found at USASpending.gov, a federal website that claims to allow users to track details about grant payments, lending an illusory sense of accountability to federal spending. But apart from USASpending’s thin profiles — which include the names of receiving organizations, total dollar amounts, and one-sentence descriptions — there’s nothing else to see.
Turns out, this snapshot barely scratches the surface. The real stories lie within grant agreements, legal instruments used by federal agencies to outline financial contracts with organizations they fund. These paper trails between agency bureaucrats and outside operatives explain where taxpayer money is going to and why. But unlike USASpending, grant agreements remain inaccessible to the public and even politically-appointed officials working in the Executive Branch. Those wanting to bring accountability face an arduous and incongruent bureaucratic beast. Locked in government databases that vary agency by agency, federal grants receive little to no oversight aside from nebulous profiles that often hide insidious realities.
The Globalist Scheme for “COVID” Population Control
For example, while USAID claimed money was sent to Pathfinder to “respond to COVID-19,” the grant agreement outlines what the actual intent was: to increase sexual and reproductive services for 1.5 million Ethiopians. The grant glosses over this by pretending that USAID funding would support the government’s efforts to “suppress” COVID-19. But the real virus Pathfinder wanted to suppress was the number of “unintended pregnancies” and “other adverse sexual and reproductive health outcomes” it argued would grow rampant during the pandemic (4-5).
The justification is plain as day: Pathfinder would use U.S. taxpayer funding to entrench sexual health services, including abortion and birth control, in developing nations during a global crisis. How? By manipulating the public through messaging campaigns that declared these health services “essential,” “orienting” staff to adopt this messaging, and ensuring that abortions and birth control were provided in “safe” health facilities (13, 22).
Through a program called “Transform,” USAID funded mobile vans and audio-mounted vehicles to broadcast propaganda messages about birth control and COVID-19 in public spaces like mosques, TV stations and radio spots. The same project sent out over 800 health care workers to inject Ethiopian women with long-lasting and dangerous contraceptives.
Pathfinder’s goal to integrate abortion as the focal point of their pandemic operation was blatantly obvious; if not within the grant agreement itself, then littered across its entire COVID-19 strategy. Lauding abortion as a right to be enshrined in international law, Pathfinder staff led worldwide guidance on performing abortions during the pandemic. This included removing safety requirements and aggressively pushing for unsupervised “DIY” medication abortions that women could “manage” on their own — all while USAID funded nearly 60% of its entire revenue.
Pathfinder’s poisonous past and incestuous relationship with the U.S. federal government are worthy of another exposé. Since its inception, the organization has been an under-the-radar but powerful weapon in USAID’s long-standing scheme to implement global population control
Almost exclusively funded by USAID, the organization was the brainchild of eugenicist Clarence Gamble as part of the mid-20th century strategy to enforce eugenics through the rapid mainstreaming and dispersion of contraceptives, abortions, and forced sterilizations. Operating through USAID, Pathfinder was at the forefront of a botched birth control campaign that distributed unsafe and deadly contraceptives in the 1970s. It led the global fight for abortion rights and sued the U.S. government over pro-life protections like the Mexico City Policy. This history was widely lauded by Pathfinder until last year, when most of it was scrubbed from the outward-facing website after Gamble’s children left the organization claiming it was covering up their father’s eugenic past and other scandals.
USAID has long been the lifeblood of scum like Pathfinder and related organizations who survive off of the opaque and corrupt federal grants process. This grant is only one part of millions in dollars in “COVID” response that the federal government operationalized to force a population control agenda down the throats of developing countries. Despite the Trump Administration’s broad strides to strip federal funding from leftist organizations, especially for global abortion funding, continual undermining from nefarious personnel and the coordination of the Administrative State kept the door open to millions in grants paid out to ambiguous entities like Pathfinder, The Population Council, Intrahealth International, JSI, and other population control operatives. By the end of 2020, USAID had pledged over $1.3 billion in global COVID-Relief programs alone, a number that has skyrocketed to over $9 billion with the Biden regime’s expanded use of USAID.
This wouldn’t be the first time this has happened, and it certainly won’t be the last. If this level of coordination happened at USAID, there is no telling how extensive the grants apparatus stretches across other executive agencies. Over the last three years, American taxpayers have experienced what this rampant abuse of their funds can do, and whistleblowers and FOIA requests have pulled back the curtain on some of the most destructive whims of the government grants process to date.
It was through a grant that the U.S. became the biggest stakeholder in the noxious gain-of-function research at the center of the Wuhan Virology Lab. It was through a grant that the NIH operationalized a baby organ and tissue pipeline at the University of Pittsburgh for unfounded scientific “progress.” And it was through grants that the Department of Education and DOJ sent billions to “justice nonprofits” and “community organizers” who led left-wing protests on climate, immigration, and race — the same groups responsible for deploying Black Lives Matter rioters to burn down American cities in the summer of 2020.
The agenda enabling this monstrous weapon to thrive off of the love-fest between federal bureaucrats and globalist elite actors is one the American people reject. A reckoning is coming — and it starts with exposing their hand.
Sophie Antenora is pseudonymous former employee of the federal government.
Survivor Eliza Bleu says that human trafficking increased during the lockdowns ‘by every metric and [set of] data we have available.’
Brad Polumbo March 27, 2022
On the latest BASEDPolitics podcast, human trafficking survivor & survivor advocate Eliza Bleu told her harrowing personal story of surviving one of the world’s worst crimes. So, too, Bleu explained the many ways that foolish Big Government policies make human trafficking worse—with COVID lockdowns as the prime example.
“Human trafficking can happen to anyone,” she said. “That’s why the pandemic was so scary for me, during the lockdowns.”
“[We suddenly had] an entire world or nation that’s an at-risk, vulnerable population,” Bleu continued. “Folks that are experiencing homelessness, food insecurity, addiction, mental health issues, these are all the perfect storm for exploitation.”
While government COVID lockdowns did not meaningful reduce COVID-19 deaths according to a John Hopkins meta-study, they did cause widespread isolation and economic devastation that fueled all the above issues.
However tragic, Bleu said this was always going to lead to more human trafficking, and data have confirmed it. She said that human trafficking increased during the lockdowns “by every metric and [set of] data we have available.”
“Right away, within the first month of lockdowns, the human trafficking hotline received a 40% increase in phone calls. After the second month it was a 46% increase. It was the same with the national sexual assault hotline—especially from children. A lot more children were calling.”
It’s not just the lockdowns, but any crisis or government oppression that leads to this vulnerability.
“When we look now at the situation that’s going on in Ukraine-Russia, it’s the perfect breeding ground for exploitation,” Bleu said. “When folks are fleeing… when the at-risk vulnerable [population] starts going up, it’s going to increase no matter what.”
To hear Eliza Bleu’s full story, listen to the latest BASEDPolitics podcast on Apple, Spotify, other platforms, or below. Follow Eliza on Twitter and check out her podcast here.
How Dr. Collins used religious leaders to push COVID origin and masking and vaccination directives onto American Christians.
In an excellent article at the Daily Wire, Megan Basham outlines how Dr. Francis Collins used religious leaders to push the government’s COVID policies to Christians.
Dr. Francis Collins of the NIH was used as a vehicle to push the government’s theories and practices upon Christians during the pandemic. He pushed his and Dr. Fauci’s scam that COVID was created independently in nature calling those who thought it was built in a lab, conspiracy theorists. Since that time we have uncovered Dr. Collins and Fauci’s lies to Congress on the subject. These doctors didn’t want Americans and Christians to know that COVID was created in a lab in China by the Chinese military using US dollars they gave to aid in the research and development.
We now also know that Dr. Fauci and Dr. Collins were scheming on ways to destroy those who were challenging failed and deadly policies.
Collins participated in a livestream event, co-hosted by CT [Christianity Today]. The outlet introduced him as a “follower of Jesus, who affirms the sanctity of human life” despite the fact that Collins is on record stating he does not definitively believe, as most pro-lifers do, that life begins at conception, and his tenure at NIH has been marked by extreme anti-life, pro-LGBT policies. (More on this later).
But the pro-life Christian framing was sure to win Collins a hearing among an audience with deep religious convictions about the evil of abortion. Many likely felt reassured to hear that a likeminded medical expert was representing them in the administration.
During the panel interview, Collins continued to insist that the lab leak theory wasn’t just unlikely but qualified for the dreaded misinformation label. “If you were trying to design a more dangerous coronavirus,” he said, “you would never have designed this one … So I think one can say with great confidence that in this case the bioterrorist was nature … Humans did not make this one. Nature did.”
It was the same message his subordinate, Dr. Anthony Fauci, had been giving to secular news outlets, but Collins was specifically tapped to carry the message to the faithful. As Time Magazine reported in Feb. 2021, “While Fauci has been medicine’s public face, Collins has been hitting the faith-based circuit…and preaching science to believers.”
The editors, writers, and reporters at Christian organizations didn’t question Collins any more than their mainstream counterparts questioned Fauci.
While Christian leaders were pushing Collins as a man you can trust, there was evidence that indicated this was not so.
Going by his concrete record, however, he seems like a strange ambassador to spread the government’s Covid messaging to theologically conservative congregations. Other than his proclamations that he is, himself, a believer, the NIH director espouses nearly no public positions that would mark him out as any different from any extreme Left-wing bureaucrat.
He has not only defended experimentation on fetuses obtained by abortion, he has also directed record-level spending toward it. Among the priorities the NIH has funded under Collins — a University of Pittsburgh experiment that involved grafting infant scalps onto lab rats, as well as projects that relied on the harvested organs of aborted, full-term babies. Some doctors have even charged Collins with giving money to research that required extracting kidneys, ureters, and bladders from living infants.
He further has endorsed unrestricted funding of embryonic stem cell research, personally attending President Obama’s signing of an Executive Order to reverse a previous ban on such expenditures. When Nature magazine asked him about the Trump administration’s decision to shut down fetal cell research, Collins made it clear he disagreed, saying, “I think it’s widely known that the NIH tried to protect the continued use of human fetal tissue. But ultimately, the White House decided otherwise. And we had no choice but to stand down.”
There was a whole strategy surrounding the implementation of COVID policies and narratives. The Christian coalition had to be addressed. Dr. Collins, despite his horrible record, was never challenged and was used to push insane and untrue directives and tales to the faithful.
“You Shouldn’t Be Forced to Take Something You Don’t Want” – Shaquille O’Neal RIPS Vaccine Mandates (VIDEO)
Shaquille O’Neal opened up about his thoughts on mandated COVID-19 vaccination policies, disagreeing with the notion that people should be forced to get the jab.
O’Neal, the Basketball Hall of Famer who won NBA championships with the Los Angeles Lakers and Miami Heat during his career, encouraged his listeners on “The Big Podcast with Shaq” to “be safe and “take care of your family.” But he disagreed with forcing those people who don’t want it to get it.
“But it’s just, people don’t want to take it, and you shouldn’t be forced to take something you don’t want,” he said.
O’Neal and his co-hosts Nischelle Turner and Anthony “Spice” Adams spoke about the New York nurses who were accused of making more than $1 million over fake vaccine cards. O’Neal said the two shouldn’t be sent to jail and gave Turner a hypothetical scenario regarding her work on “Entertainment Tonight.”
Virginia AG to Intervene in Loudoun County Mask Fight After Assistant Principal Threatens to Charge Maskless Elementary Schoolchildren with “Trespassing”
In Virginia, trespassing is a class I misdemeanor that holds a 12-month jail sentence or $2,500 fine.
This woman should be fired immediately.
“It is important that I point out to you, stated in the letter that you’ll receive, it’s important that I point out to you that they’re not allowed on campus or on Loudoun County Public School property starting tomorrow,” said Assistant Principal Janet Davidson. “It will be considered trespassing.”
AUDIO via Daily Caller reporter Chrissy Clark:
A student at Stone Bridge High School (same school where male student raped a girl without being suspended) was already suspended for 10 days for not wearing a mask on campus.
Virginia AG Jason Miyares said he was going to intervene in the Loudoun County mask fight shortly after this audio was released to the public.
Miyares told the Daily Caller’s editor Vince Coglianese, “You will be seeing some news from our office in the next 24 hours on behalf of those parents in Loudoun County…”
Jummai’s Vax Nightmare: Double Leg Amputee & Will Lose Her Hands Too. Right After Vax
Exclusive: Barbara Simpson offers update on David Daleiden’s work to end ’tissue’ sale
January 28, 2022
The news was filled with the issue of abortion as thousands gathered from across the country for the March for Life, the annual anti-abortion rally. It’s reported that the mood among the marchers is that the end of legal abortion is near.
The march this year was held the day before the 49th anniversary of the Roe v. Wade Supreme Court decision, which established the constitutional right to an abortion.
Given that the Court will be handing down an upcoming decision concerning a Mississippi abortion law, there is a mood among many that it could result in overturning Roe. Time will tell, but there appears to be growing hope for that.
The public impression is that abortion involves women who have severe problems with being pregnant and that the abortion will help solve them. End the pregnancy, problem gone. Be that as it may, there is another a side of abortion that is more detailed and grotesque. It involves what is done with, and to, the aborted infants and who pays for it and why.
This is an issue that most people knew nothing about until the release several years ago of undercover videos of interviews of Planned Parenthood officials by David Daleiden of the CMP, Center for Medical Progress. Those videos showed how Planned Parenthood leaders negotiated the sale of tiny baby hearts, lungs, brains and other body parts.
The result of the videos was that many states defunded Planned Parenthood, shut down baby-parts trafficking companies and prompted a serious FBI investigation. There was also congressional interest in the videos and what they meant to Planned Parenthood financing.
Needless to say, it also made Daleiden a target, and target he remains. Then-California Attorney General Kamala Harris put together a felony criminal case against him – a case that is still moving slowly toward a possible state trial on nine counts.
Daleiden was also sued in 2016 in San Francisco federal court by Planned Parenthood and the National Abortion Federation.
It’s interesting to note that well-known San Francisco Judge William Orrick was the federal judge in that case. Despite the fact that he had separately founded a Planned Parenthood Abortion Referral Clinic that led pregnant women into the same fetal harvesting centers Daleiden’s videos exposed, Judge Orrick refused to recuse himself from the case.
So much for California justice.
According to Daleiden, Harris’ AG’s office used its search warrant powers to help Planned Parenthood, the NAF and Judge Orrick in the trial. It resulted in a $16 million judgment against Daleiden and the censoring of hundreds of hours of unreleased undercover footage.
His more recent investigation revealed the government-sponsored fetal experimentation at the University of Pittsburgh.
One experiment Pitt scientists published last year took the scalps of 5-month-old aborted babies and stitched them to the backs of lab rats to keep them growing.
This was paid for with a nearly half-million-dollar “research grant” from the NIAID office of Dr. Anthony Fauci at the National Institutes of Health, NIH.
Another experiment involved the livers from 5-month-old aborted babies to extract stem cells so they could be experimentally transplanted into adults. According to the CMP, the premature babies were aborted alive via labor induction, washed to keep them sterile, and then cut open to harvest the liver.
CMP reports that the Pitt scientist who invented this experiment received nearly $3 million from the NIH, and his published research shows he was using this technique in Pittsburgh as recently as 2019.
Despite his legal woes, Daleiden doesn’t give up. In 2020, he submitted a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request to the NIH about the University of Pittsburgh’s grant applications for the “GUDMAP” program – a massive “distribution hub” for the kidneys of aborted babies up to 5 and 6 months old.
It wasn’t easy to get the requested information – taking time and legal action. It was just last summer that Daleiden got a response. The government documents said that Pitt advertised to them that it would be the best site for this grant because it could use labor induction abortions – where the baby is pushed out of the mother in a pre-term delivery – as a “procedure that will be used to obtain the tissue.”
Pitt said it would track, record and “minimize the time the kidneys were disconnected from blood circulation.”
In other words, the meaning of what Pitt said is that it would deliver premature babies alive with beating hearts and then kill them by cutting their kidney’s out.
According the Daleiden, many of them would be old enough to survive with emergency medical care.
Daleiden said the release of this information led to nearly 100 congressional representatives demanding to find out just what the government knew and when they knew it about this criminal trafficking of aborted infants.
They are waiting for a response from Attorney General Merrick Garland, the NIH’s Dr. Francis Collins and NIAID’s Dr. Anthony Fauci.
No response yet.
Throughout all this Pitt denies any relationship with Planned Parenthood. However, from public information, Daleiden says it’s known that Planned Parenthood supplies aborted fetuses to Pitt, which uses them to get major NIH grant money and sends major kickbacks and medical resources back to Planned Parenthood.
Much of these procedures are paid for by federal spending and, in fact, Dr. Fauci’s agency is responsible for nearly 60% of federal spending on experiments with aborted baby parts.
While the investigation continues, David Daleiden faces massive personal financial and legal consequences, including possible jail time for investigating the behind the scenes of Planned Parenthood with the government paying for horrible experiments with preborn children.
No one would ever accept permanent fever… So, why accept permanently high antibodies? It’s a “Death Zone”!
High Antibodies Myth – Evolution has pruned out those with constant high levels of antibodies, isn’t that a sign we should heed?
By Marc Girardot
In very high altitude climbing, there is a zone called the “Death Zone”, a zone above which your survival is limited in time: you can stay there 16-20 hours maximum. Nobody in their right mind, climbing Mount Everest, would stay up on top long …
High altitudes have a strong appeal to many – an adventure to tell your grand-children, a transcendence of a lifetime, the quest of excellence … – but there’s a reason it’s called the Death Zone: If you stay too long, you die. There’s no getting away. Safety and life is down in the valley. The only option is down.
The same principle applies to our immune system. You can get out of balance, but not for too long. During an infection, a temporary disbalance is an acceptable trade-off to fight and oust the virus:
high fever1 to damage as many virions as possible,
temporary invasion of T-cells to prune out every single infected cells,
and a huge count of antibodies to neutralise and evacuate the rest of the viral debris.
Once the infection is gone, a regiment of sentinels is left in the mucus to guard the entrance for the remainder of the epidemic, a few roaming sentinels with lifelong memory are set, and the rest wanes back down to bring peace and balance. It’s called homeostasis. The fever dissipates. T-cells self-destruct2 rapidly. And antibodies wane progressively.
Why is that? Why has Evolution selected the path of dissipated fever, suicidal T-cells and slowly reduced antibodies? Well there’s a safety-related answer, and it is quite obvious:
Too long a fever would end up breaking down all healthy cells, and so the remedy would be worse than the illness.
Perpetual specialised T-cells are also dangerous as they can start off-target attacks of healthy cells (as often occurs with immune checkpoint blockade treatments against cancer), and would be like leaving your home filled with a battalion of armed soldiers with their guns loaded and pin-less hand-grenades.
Finally, very high levels of antibodies with nowhere to go are also extremely dangerous. They can passively bind to receptors of healthy cells, and kickstart a cascade of autoimmune diseases. Land mining where you live.
Today, I would like to underscore the absolute lunacy of delivering these products to an entire population every 3-4 months. It’s nothing short of criminal.
In my earnest opinion, repeated vaccine injections can only lead to one outcome: generalised illness and death. Permanently high antibodies are a “Death Zone” equivalent: a very high risk of accelerated auto-immune disorders development: Parkinson, Kawasaki, multiple sclerosis, demyelinating disorders…
Viruses often share genetic material with humans. A concept called molecular mimicry. In reaction to an infection, the immune system can occasionally develop an immune arsenal against its own cells expressing this shared material. As you can see from the table below, the SARS-COV-2 spike shares quite a few peptides with human cells.
Source: “Covid-19 and autoimmunity” by Michael Ehrenfeld et al, Autoimmunity Reviews, 2020
In the case of an infection, the risk is relatively limited as the bulk of antibodies ends up binding to viral material circulating in large numbers. However, in the case of repeated doses, it’s very different. After the second shot, it is likely that limited amounts of spike are produced as T-cells rapidly destroy production capacity. Thus, for most of us, large quantities of antibodies will inevitably be left idle circulating aimlessly, expanding exponentially (time x quantity) the risk of an accidental binding with catastrophic consequences. If some doctors are afraid of the possible consequences of viruses in the creation of auto-immune diseases, they should be terrified by the scale and the duration of this “Death Zone” generated by repeated injections.
Evolution has played the scenario before and it’s not good. Some ancestors didn’t benefit from waning antibodies, and everyone of them have disappeared from the planet… This should be telling to politicians who want to force these mandates as to the risk they are taking with the population and as to their responsibility.
To show this is not partisan, but factual. I am not an anti-vaxxer. I will quote an article that pre-dates this pandemic, and states: “As history teaches us, vaccines, instrumental as they are in modern medicine, are subject to possible flaws in the same manner that all man-made developments are.”.
Current vaccines have multiple flaws. One major flaw is not having corrected for the shared material with the human genome. Autologous peptides were a known risk that was avoidable. Protected vaccine manufacturers chose to ignore them. And Public Health authorities and politicians cannot continue to turn a blind eye without catastrophic consequences.
The vaccination “Death Zone” exists, and we need to urgently go back down in the valley, we need to stop vaccinating, stop boosting aimless antibodies and trust our immune systems.1
Need to write a piece on the damage of Paracetamol, and its’ potential role in a wider and more lethal pandemic.2
After saving the lives of nearly 2,000 Covid patients, many of who were refused adequate medications in hospitals, Washington-based Physician Assistant Scott Miller is unable to legally practice medicine for the foreseeable future.
Miller and numerous medical experts contend hospitalized Covid patients are not actually dying from the virus but are essentially held hostage once admitted – prohibited visitation or going home—and are typically administered Remdesivir and intubated to death.
Guidelines ushered in by the Center For Disease Control during the manufactured coronavirus pandemic bar medical practitioners from administering treatment for pneumonia, respiratory illness, and other symptoms of Covid infection.
As family members of those hospitalized with Covid received notice from hospitals informing them that their loved ones were becoming critically ill and would be intubated, a procedure that kills the majority of those who undergo the surgery, they reached out to Miller for assistance.
While advocating for hospitalized Covid patients, the Physician Assistant has argued with countless doctors to do the right thing and treat symptoms of the virus, as they had prior to the pandemic rather than adhering to the CDC’s lethal protocols.
His commitment to saving lives, upholding the Hippocratic oath and decision to call attention to the illogical scheme, rather than keep his job, obey with CDC’s science-inverting guidelines and watch people needlessly die in medical facilities prompted the Washington Medical Commission to revoke his medical license in October.
In a video exclusively provided to The Gateway Pundit, Miller reviews the allegedly dangerous and unethical charges filed against him by Dr. Leslie Enzian that resulted in the medical commission barring him from his medical practice.
Miller purportedly engaged in “threatening” behavior by “failing to social distance,” not wearing a mask “while speaking to a fully unmasked audience” and recommending and treating Covid patients with vitamins, Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine, Enzian, a Seattle-based Internal Medicine Specialist who works at Harborview Medical CenterMiller, warns in the 22-page complaint provided to the WMC.
Despite being targeted for exposing the corruption, the pediatric specialist stands by his assessment of the hospital’s murderous malpractice and flagrant negligence.
“Over 700,000 Americans have needlessly died in our hospitals. So yeah – you go to the hospital and all of your patient rights are gone,” he explained. “You’re isolated. Most of the time, a family member can go days without even being able to speak to a doctor, no less their loved one.
“Mechanical ventilation. [The] standard of care in Peace Health Hospital Southwest in Vancouver, Washington – what do they have? About a 10 percent survival rate once they are ventilated, Dr. Leslie Enzian? So, the standard of care is killing?”
The renegade health practitioner’s license should be revoked because he insists “50 percent of the COVID-19 mortality could have been mitigated if people had adequate levels of vitamin D levels,” “spoke out “about hydroxychloroquine” efficacy and “glaringly omits a recommendation for vaccination when discussing ways to prevent the risk of severity of COVID-19 infection,” Enzian warns.
“Respondent stated, ‘Anecdotally, I’ve had patients who were sick. They got one dose and after the first dose, they were 100 percent better the next day,’” she continued.
Miller maintains that he will continue to speak the truth, stands by facts and refuse to back down amid systematic coercion.
“Anecdotally, that’s what [patients] told me – they were in the [intensive care unit] and they were dying, and they got Hydroxychloroquine and the next day – they were released a couple of days later and here with their child in my office,” he said. “So, hmm…I guess I shouldn’t have said that out loud.
“I referred to an article that called Melatonin a silver bullet So, I am not allowed to say this. This is a reason for suspension. There were four or five hundred that were desperately ill and sent home by the hospital or were actually in the ICU and I had to figure out a tricky way…anyway, they all came home because it works.”
Propaganda claimingCovid vaccines prevent transmission of Covid is demonstrably and irrefutably false, he contends:
“I guess this was written pre her ability to see that vaccination does not mitigate somebody getting infected or sick or dying. I had to add, ‘Hey, get vaccinated, you won’t get sick – because I didn’t want to lie to people.”
Enzian claims Miller is a menace to the community because he “encouraged parents to disenroll their students from school” amid Covid mandates and school procedures.
“I told them to unenroll their kids because schools are useless,” Miller states. “How do you trust your school when you’re telling them that they can take their masks off and sit next to each other and eat lunch or go outside and play, but when they’re in the classroom they have to wear it? It’s idiocy.”
Miller refusal to encourage people to social distance warrants penalty, Enzian argues, noting “Respondent was not socially distancing (while unmasked) when attending a church gathering to present a fully unmasked audience,” the “doctor” Enzian notes, adding, “On a talk show interview, after the suspension of his license, respondent complained about social distancing guidelines, ‘Stand six feet apart, 3 feet apart. Why?’”
“No. My question is which one? Six feet? Three feet? Nine feet? Unless you’re sitting right here, and you’re eating, then you just take your mask off and hang out for a while,” Miller shot back.
IN 1994 160 NATIONS AGREED TO REDUCE THE WORLD POPULATION TO 800 MILLION BY 2030
THE NARRATIVE IS COLLAPSING
Winning! OSHA Formally Withdraws Biden Vaccine Mandate But We’ll Be Back! Focusing on ‘finalizing a permanent COVID-19 Healthcare Standard’
HANNAH BLEAU 25 Jan 2022
The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) is formally withdrawing President Joe Biden’s coronavirus vaccine mandate, which would have affected roughly 84 million workers across the country, the agency announced on Tuesday.
In a January 25 statement, OSHA announced the withdrawal of the vaccination and testing emergency temporary standard, which it issued on November 5, 2021. In its statement, it pitched the mandate as a means to “protect unvaccinated employees of large employers with 100 or more employees from workplace exposure to coronavirus.”
“The withdrawal is effective January 26, 2022,” OSHA announced, although it clarified it is not withdrawing the ETS as a “proposed rule.”
“Although OSHA is withdrawing the vaccination and testing ETS as an enforceable emergency temporary standard, the agency is not withdrawing the ETS as a proposed rule. The agency is prioritizing its resources to focus on finalizing a permanent COVID-19 Healthcare Standard,” the agency said, emphasizing that it “strongly encourages vaccination of workers against the continuing dangers posed by COVID-19 in the workplace.”
President Joe Biden originally pitched the rule in a divisive September speech on the Chinese coronavirus in which he scolded unvaccinated Americans, warning that patience was “wearing thin.”
“We’ve been patient, but our patience is wearing thin. And your refusal has cost all of us. So, please, do the right thing,” Biden said in the inflammatory speech, attempting to coerce unvaccinated Americans into following his edicts.
“But just don’t take it from me; listen to the voices of unvaccinated Americans who are lying in hospital beds, taking their final breaths, saying, ‘If only I had gotten vaccinated. If only,’” he said, ultimately pitching the rule to “protect vaccinated workers from unvaccinated co-workers.”
Per the rule, employers with 100 or more employees would be forced to implement vaccine mandate or implement testing requirements. Under OSHA’s rule, the burden of the cost of testing would remain on the unvaccinated employee, essentially amounting to a work tax. The rule would have affected roughly 84 million workers across the country.
However, the Supreme Court this month blocked the mandate in a 6-3 decision, although Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Brett Kavanaugh sided with the liberal justices in keeping the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) mandate on healthcare workers, although the Court explicitly acknowledged that the CMS mandate still exempts workers who object to the vaccine for religious or medical reasons.
The Supreme Court’s rejection of Biden’s OSHA mandate came over a year after Biden, who was then president-elect, said he “wouldn’t demand” mandatory coronavirus vaccines.
“No. I don’t think it should be mandatory. I wouldn’t demand it be mandatory,” Biden said at the time. “But I would do everything in my power — I don’t think masks need to be made mandatory nationwide.”
Notably, Biden has flip-flopped on both of those positions, as masks are still required on planes and the country goes far beyond his original pitch for “just” 100 days of masking.
The applications are NFIB v. OSHA, No. 21A244 at the Supreme Court of the United States, and Biden v. Missouri, No. 21A240 in the Supreme Court of the United States.
Without Notice FDA Revokes Monoclonal Antibody Treatments for COVID, Promote Difficult to Find Pfizer and Merck Pills as Replacements
January 25, 2022 | Sundance
This is some next level sketchy, borderline evil, stuff from the U.S. medical establishment. The FDA has revoked the authorization status of monoclonal antibody treatments [Announcement Here], effectively shutting down the treatment option for patients exposed to COVID-19.
The FDA gave no advanced notice of their arbitrary decision; they just issued a press release Monday evening and immediately revoked the Emergency Use Authorization.
The result was that no states were given any time to prepare for the shutdown or cancel the scheduled appointments of their patients.
On the surface the FDA justification is essentially that monoclonal antibody treatments are “unlikely to be active against the omicron variant,” so the monoclonal treatment option is revoked. However, below the surface it looks like the FDA reason for the revocation is to push the Pfizer and Merck pills as the primarily authorized therapeutics. The problem with the pills is they are hard to find and in short supply.
New York Supreme Court Strikes Down State Mask Mandate
January 24, 2022 | Sundance
This is a very good thing. A New York State Supreme Court has blocked the unilateral state-wide mask mandate of Governor Kathy Hochul and state Health Commissioner Basset. The legal reasoning is very important. NY Supreme Court Ruling HERE.
The authority of the New York governor and health commissioner, provided by the declaration of a state emergency, has expired. With that expiration any/all mandates from the office are invalid; all requirements for public health -such as the mask mandate- MUST come from the legislative body.
According to the ruling, Judge Thomas Rademaker said that neither the governor nor the state health commissioner had the authority to enact the mandate without the state legislature, since the governor no longer has emergency powers. [full pdf here]
Government data show ‘vax-free’ LESS likely to get COVID
Rate of infection more than twice as high for vaccinated people
By Art MooreJanuary 24, 2022
Army Sgt. Heidy Bucheli, noncommissioned officer in charge of anesthesiology at Landstuhl Regional Medical Center, prepares a COVID-19 vaccination for children ages 5 to 11 at LRMC in Landstuhl, Germany, Nov. 18, 2021. (U.S. Dept. of Defense photo by Marcy Sanchez)
Data released by the Scottish government show people who have been vaccinated with two or three doses of the COVID-19 mRNA vaccines are more likely to become infected, be hospitalized or die than people who are unvaccinated.
The Public Health Scotland data from the past four weeks showed a rate of infection of 866 per 100,000 people for the double vaccinated and 481 per 100,000 for the boosted, or triple vaccinated.
The unvaccinated had a rate of infection of 413 per 100,000.
The death rate of those who have had two shots is about 12 per 100,000 which is more than 50% higher than the rate for the unvaccinated,
Israel and Britain saw COVID deaths hit all-time highs after launching mass vaccination campaigns.
Data from the U.K. from Aug. 16 to Dec. 5, 2021, showed people who had been vaccinated accounted for four of every five COVID-19 deaths, the Gateway Pundit reported.
Further, a U.K. “technical briefing on SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern” found that as of Dec. 29, the fully vaccinated make up 74% hospitalizations due to infection from the omicron variant that now dominates Western nations.
Now the World Health Organization has waved the white flag on Covid vaccine boosters too.
WHO released a statement about Covid vaccines yesterday. It’s filled with the usual public health jargon and ass-covering, but one line stands out:
a vaccination strategy based on repeated booster doses of the original vaccine composition is unlikely to be appropriate or sustainable.
It’s over, people.
Aside from a few unlucky Israelis, no one is going to receive a fourth dose of the original vaccine; everyone with eyes can see it doesn’t work against Omicron. (And if you haven’t gotten a third dose, at this point, why would you? You are getting at most weeks of marginally improved protection for potentially severe side effects.)
Instead the WHO is now promising/demanding vaccines based on whatever the dominant Sars-Cov-2 strain is at the moment.
That promise is as empty as all the others the health bureaucrats and vaccine companies have made.
At least five major variants (“variants of concern”) have developed in the last year, and two have become globally dominant. Even the mRNA vaccines cannot be cooked up and delivered fast enough to match whatever strain of virus becomes dominant. Covid is faster than the scientists.
New Pentagon Documents Point To COVID-19’s Laboratory Origin as a Chinese Bioweapon and U.S. Government Complicity
As described in a Gateway Pundit article last year, for over 15 years China has conducted biowarfare research on genetically-engineered viruses coupled to a vaccine-production program to protect its own military from those China-made bioweapons.
Hold on to that thought for a moment.
The just-released memorandum written on August 21, 2021, by U.S. Marine Major Joseph Murphy to the Inspector General of the U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) is highly revealing, both for what it says and for what it doesn’t say.
Major Murphy’s analysis is based on a $14.2 million research grant application “Project DEFUSE: Defusing the Threat of Bat-borne Coronaviruses” by now-disgraced scientist Peter Daszak, head of the EcoHealth Alliance, and submitted to the DoD’s Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA), as well as other documents to which we do not yet have access.
Daszak’s research team included the “Bat Woman” Zheng-Li Shi of the Wuhan Institute of Virology, Ralph Baric of the University of North Carolina, Linfa Wang of the Duke University-National University of Singapore Medical School, Tonie Rocke of the United States Geological Survey National Wildlife Health Center in Wisconsin, and Jerome Unidad of the Palo Alto Research Center in California.
A summary of the memorandum:
1. “SARS-CoV-2 [COVID-19] is an American-created recombinant bat vaccine, or its precursor virus.”
The intent of Daszak’s DARPA proposal was to immunize bats in Chinese caves by spraying them with a vaccine based on coronaviruses that would likely “jump” from bats to humans, thereby, preventing a pandemic.
Sound far-fetched? Stand by, the details get worse.
The DEFUSE team would collect a large number of bat coronaviruses from Chinese caves, test them for their ability to infect humans, select those most likely to make the “jump” from bats to humans, analyze their structures and map evolutionary pathways.
Of course, the concept of a vaccine based on an evolutionary model, given the highly unpredictable nature of bat coronavirus mutations is, on its face, scientifically preposterous.
Yet, if they had stopped at that point and created a bat vaccine based on a natural bat coronavirus, the project would have been a failure, but at least there would not have been a COVID-19 pandemic.
They planned to isolate the spike protein, the component of coronaviruses that regulates infectively, and genetically manipulate it to make it more infectious to humans and insert it back into a bat coronavirus backbone as a virus precursor for making a bat vaccine.
The DEFUSE team writes about introducing “human specific” structures, like furin polybasic cleavage sites, where they do not occur naturally, highly indicative of bioweapon development and consistent with the Chinese military’s joint pathogen development/vaccine production program.
The DEFUSE proposal read like a recipe for COVID-19.
Ultimately, the Daszak DEFUSE proposal was rejected because it included such dangerous “gain of function” research, the product of which also having dual use capability as a bioweapon.
Nevertheless, the money kept flowing from Anthony Fauci’s National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, through Peter Daszak, to China.
2. Without providing the evidence upon which his conclusion is based, Major Murphy stated that an incomplete precursor virus was released, presumably through a laboratory accident, in August 2019 and thereafter, again presumably, circulating and mutating within the Chinese population until reaching an epidemic-producing state in November-December 2019.
3. Major Murphy also questioned the DoD’s vaccine mandate, given the potential toxicity of mRNA vaccines based on the COVID-19 spike protein, as well as opposing the official suppression by the U.S. government of early intervention therapeutics, like ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine, which his analysis found efficacious for treating coronavirus infections.
Based on a preponderance of evidence, COVID-19 was made in a laboratory in China as part of a biowarfare program, which was facilitated by U.S. government officials and U.S.-based scientists, who then tried to cover up their complicity and implemented flawed public health policies, all of which likely led to the unnecessary deaths of hundreds of thousands of Americans.
Lawrence Sellin, Ph.D. is retired U.S. Army Reserve colonel and a veteran of Afghanistan and Iraq. He had a civilian career in international business and medical research. His email address is email@example.com.
Dr. Cory Pierre: The tragedy Maria is that this entire pandemic we have not had an early treatment recommended by the government. Because they’ve been waiting for the approvals of the novel patented drugs. And the two that just got approval, ONE STUDY! One and done with these pharmaceutical companies. And meanwhile you have these generic drugs that have dozens of studies and trials and they don’t get approved. It is absolutely absurd. And these drugs that just got approved. One doesn’t work. india just canceled their order for it because they know it doesn’t work and the other one is highly toxic. And so the absurdity and the tragedy and damage on the America people by a broken system. We need to fix this where people are dying because they are denied highly effective, cheap, widely available drugs that do not present as obscene profits to the pharmaceutical companies.
Maria Bartiromo: That is disgusting! I know for a fact that hydroxychloroquine and Ivermectin work to treat COVID.
The panel later mentioned how approximately 500,000 Americans have died after they were denied and prevented access to highly effective treatment drugs.
The CDC stated on its website (last reviewed Sept. 2021) that to control the spread of disease within their borders, states have laws to enforce the use of isolation and quarantine. The law also includes the use of police power functions in their quarantine stations.
“In addition to serving as medical functions, isolation and quarantine also are “police power” functions, derived from the right of the state to take action affecting individuals for the benefit of society,” CDC stated on their website.
States have police power functions to protect the health, safety, and welfare of persons within their borders. To control the spread of disease within their borders, states have laws to enforce the use of isolation and quarantine.
These laws can vary from state to state and can be specific or broad. In some states, local health authorities implement state law. In most states, breaking a quarantine order is a criminal misdemeanor.
Tribes also have police power authority to take actions that promote the health, safety, and welfare of their own tribal members. Tribal health authorities may enforce their own isolation and quarantine laws within tribal lands, if such laws exist.
Who Is in Charge:
1. The federal government
Acts to prevent the entry of communicable diseases into the United States. Quarantine and isolation may be used at U.S. ports of entry.
Is authorized to take measures to prevent the spread of communicable diseases between states.
May accept state and local assistance in enforcing federal quarantine.
May assist state and local authorities in preventing the spread of communicable diseases.
2. State, local, and tribal authorities
Enforce isolation and quarantine within their borders.
It is possible for federal, state, local, and tribal health authorities to have and use all at the same time separate but coexisting legal quarantine power in certain events. In the event of a conflict, federal law is supreme.
The quarantine stations are located at 20 ports of entry and land-border crossings where most international travelers arrive as stated on the website. It seems like illegal immigrants are exempted in this case.
According to its authority and scope, CDC has the legal authority to detain any person who may have an infectious disease that is specified by the Executive Order to be quarantinable.
CDC may issue a federal isolation or quarantine order if a quarantinable disease is suspected or identified. Federal isolation or quarantine order was last enforced during influenza.
As stated above, some states, local health authorities implement state law. TGP’s Alicia Powe reported that the Washington State Board of Health may soon amend state law to authorize the involuntary detainment of residents as young as 5 years old in Covid-19 “internment camps” for failing to comply with the state’s experimental vaccine mandate.
The head of a $100 billion insurance company says all-cause deaths have spiked an astonishing 40% among people ages 18-64 compared to pre-pandemic levels.
It’s an unprecedented rate that is four times higher than a once-in-200-year catastrophe, said Scott Davison, CEO of Indianapolis-based OneAmerica, during an online news conference last Thursday reported by the news site Center Square.
“We are seeing, right now, the highest death rates we have seen in the history of this business – not just at OneAmerica,” Davison said.
“The data is consistent across every player in that business.”
Meanwhile, the daily number of deaths from COVID-19, according to the state dashboard, is less than half of what it was a year ago.
The news drew the attention of epidemiologists concerned about the collateral damage caused by COVID-19 mitigation efforts. And while there is no data showing a correlation between death and vaccination, experts concerned about the safety of the vaccines also took note.
Davison, referring to the third and fourth quarters of 2021, said it’s not primarily elderly people who are dying, but “working-age people 18 to 64” who are the employees of companies that have OneAmerica plans.
Significantly, the CEO noted that most of the claims for deaths being filed are not classified as COVID-19 deaths.
But Davison apparently doesn’t see a possible connection to the vaccines.
However, Dr. Robert Malone, who has three decades of experience at the highest levels of vaccine development, said in an interview Monday morning that the insurance CEO’s statistics point to vaccine injuries.
Dr. Robert Malone, the founder of the mRNA vaccine, went on with Laura Ingraham on Monday night after his big weekend interview with Joe Rogan.
Dr. Malone was asked about Tony Fauci and his lack of integrity.
Dr. Robert Malone: ‘It’s Tony. What can I say? Tony has no integrity. He lies all of the time. And me and my peers have been watching this for decades. We just shrug our shoulders and shake our heads and say it’s Fauci.”
The scientist who combined two widely available over-the-counter compounds that inhibited the novel coronavirus by 99% in early tests told WND he’s hopeful his treatment will be available “within months.”
“An FDA-approved treatment could be in sight within months if pharmaceutical companies utilize existing clinical trial resources,” said Dr. David Ostrov in an email interview with WND
Dr. David Ostrov, associate professor in the Department of Pathology, Immunology and Laboratory Medicine at the University of Florida College of Medicine
Ostrov, an immunologist and associate professor in the University of Florida College of Medicine’s department of pathology, immunology and laboratory medicine, combined diphenhydramine, which is marketed as Benadryl, and lactoferrin, a protein in milk, as WND reported in December.
“My prediction is that antiviral drug combinations, such as diphenhydramine and lactoferrin, will provide a similar level of benefit as Regeneron monoclonal antibodies, Pfizer and Merck antivirals, at less than 1/100 the cost of those therapies,” he told WND.
Ostrov said he knew he was facing an uphill battle in his effort to find a combination of cheap, safe and available drugs to combat COVID-19.
“I expected failure, but you never know until you try,” he said. “My reaction was surprise.”
Ostrov told WND he’s been in communication with people who wonder if their use of the compounds has helped prevent them from getting COVID-19.
He noted that “anecdotal stories are certainly not proof of efficacy,” but many people have contacted him about diphenhydramine and lactoferrin, and their results “are difficult to ignore.”
“For many people, they say everyone around them got COVID, but not them,” Ostrov said.
And they ask the professor if diphenhydramine and/or lactoferrin.
“Without placebo controlled clinical trials, we will not have a definitive answer,” he said. “The answer for now, though, is maybe.”
Ostrov mentioned a contact who takes a daily dose of Benadryl and regularly drinks milk. She said she had been in close contact for hours with someone who was hospitalized the next day for COVID-19. But after waiting five days from the time of exposure, she tested negative for COVID.
He cautioned that people “considering their own concoction should understand that our experiments were carried out with human lactoferrin, not cow.” And the lactoferrin he used was purified in a special way to enhance its antiviral properties and is not likely to be found on the shelf.
People should consult with their physician, Ostrov said, before taking any drug for a use other than its intended use.
“Even though historically there are relatively few adverse events reported for diphenhydramine and lactoferrin, it should be noted that long term use of any medication, or combination of medications, could have unexpected consequences,” he said.
Ostrov said he hopes that once FDA-approved, “people may benefit from this antiviral drug combination for two-to-three month intervals during each wave of COVID infections.”
Read the Q&A:
WND: I imagine there was elation in finding 99% effectiveness in inhibiting replication of the virus that has changed the world. Can you describe your reaction and your hopes for this possible treatment?
DR. OSTROV: We were aiming to find a combination of drugs that would work much better against SARS-CoV-2 when used together. I expected failure, but you never know until you try. My reaction was surprise.
My hope is that this antiviral drug combination will be shown to both prevent and treat COVID effectively (in placebo controlled clinical trials).
Since these drugs are stable at room temperature, economical, widely available and have long histories of safety, diphenhydramine and lactoferrin have the potential to inhibit replication of the coronavirus (and the emergence of new variants) on a global scale.
WND: Can you explain in layman’s terms why these two compounds appear to be effective in inhibiting SARS-CoV-2?
DR. OSTROV: SARS-CoV-2 causes cells to undergo stress in a way that creates a good environment for the virus to replicate.
Diphenhydramine binds a specific protein involved in cell stress and blocks the virus from creating a good environment for replication. Lactoferrin has antiviral activity for different reasons. Lactoferrin is thought to repel virus particles from target cells (by binding lipoproteins on cell surfaces). Lactoferrin is also thought to suppress virus replication.
WND: How did you come to find out that diphenhydramine was potentially effective against COVID-19?
DR. OSTROV: The story started before SARS, when my lab was studying drugs that bind ACE2, the molecule that turned out to be the receptor for SARS and SARS-CoV-2.
We previously found that an antihistamine (hydroxyzine) bound ACE2, and in 2020 were able to test the ability of this drug to inhibit SARS-CoV-2 in the lab. It was an “aha” moment when the data clearly showed that a common antihistamine inhibited the virus that causes COVID. Different scientists at the University of Florida College of Medicine used different isolates of SARS-CoV-2, and the results agreed with each other. An antihistamine can inhibit the virus!
We then realized that there may be similar drugs that could inhibit the virus, perhaps even over-the-counter drugs. But which drugs?
We collaborated with investigators and UCSF where they examined the medical records for more than 219,000 people tested for SARS-CoV-2. They found that usage of diphenhydramine was associated with a lower incidence of SARS-CoV-2. In other words, in this population, people were less likely to be infected with COVID if they used diphenhydramine.
Why would taking an allergy pill lead to lower risk of COVID? There could be many reasons, but is it possible that a simple allergy pill can directly inhibit the virus that causes COVID?
We did the experiments at the University of Florida College of Medicine, and the data was published in a peer reviewed journal. Diphenhydramine exhibits direct antiviral activity against SARS-CoV-2. Diphenhydramine inhibits virus replication, inhibits virus shedding and inhibits host cell killing.
WND: Obviously, treatments for COVID-19 are needed now, but further research and human trials are necessary, which take time. Assuming the further trials affirm your early findings, how long might it be before such a treatment is available to the public?
DR. OSTROV: An FDA-approved treatment could be in sight within months if pharmaceutical companies utilize existing clinical trial resources.
My prediction is that antiviral drug combinations, such as diphenhydramine and lactoferrin, will provide a similar level of benefit as Regeneron monoclonal antibodies, Pfizer and Merck antivirals, at less than 1/100 the cost of those therapies.
WND: What is your caution to people who might try their own concoction, perhaps with Benadryl and lactoferrin? Could there be any harmful consequences?
DR. OSTROV: People considering their own concoction should understand that our experiments were carried out with human lactoferrin, not cow. The lactoferrin we used was purified in a special way to enhance its antiviral properties. People are not likely to find this on the shelf.
Could there be harmful consequences? People should consult with their physician before taking any drug “off-label,” meaning using a drug for a use other than its intended use.
Even though historically there are relatively few adverse events reported for diphenhydramine and lactoferrin, it should be noted that long term use of any medication, or combination of medications, could have unexpected consequences.
My hope is that people may benefit from this antiviral drug combination for two-to-three month intervals during each wave of COVID infections.
WND: Are there any treatments for COVID-19 available now that you have found to be effective?
DR. OSTROV: Current treatments seem to speed up recovery, but not as dramatically as we would like. We can expect that many monoclonal antibodies used for treatment will exhibit reduced effectiveness as circulating viruses acquire more mutations, such as in omicron.
Based on our understanding of the mechanism of action, mutations in the spike protein are not expected to impact the antiviral activities of diphenhydramine and lactoferrin. This is important because it means that we may be able to inhibit the virus regardless of mutations that arise in the spike protein.
EDITOR’S NOTE:Last year, America’s doctors, nurses and paramedics were celebrated as frontline heroes battling a fearsome new pandemic. Today, under Joe Biden, tens of thousands of these same heroes are denounced as rebels, conspiracy theorists, extremists and potential terrorists. Along with massive numbers of police, firemen, Border Patrol agents, Navy SEALs, pilots, air-traffic controllers, and countless other truly essential Americans, they’re all considered so dangerous as to merit termination, their professional and personal lives turned upside down due to their decision not to be injected with the experimental COVID vaccines. Biden’s tyrannical mandate threatens to cripple American society – from law enforcement to airlines to commercial supply chains to hospitals. It’s already happening. But the good news is that huge numbers of “yesterday’s heroes” are now fighting back – bravely and boldly. The whole epic showdown is laid out as never before in the sensational October issue of WND’s monthly Whistleblower magazine, titled “THE GREAT AMERICAN REBELLION: ‘We will not comply!’ COVID-19 power grab ignites bold new era of national defiance.”
What media aren’t telling you about Pfizer’s new COVID medicine
Exclusive: Joel S. Hirschhorn offers rundown on drug making more billionaires out of firms’ execs
The pro-drug-industry mainstream media are insanely positive about the newly FDA-approved Pfizer antiviral COVID treatment pills.
The drug, Paxlovid, received an emergency use authorization by FDA for use in patients 12 years old and up who have tested positive for COVID-19 and are at high risk.
Now is the time to speak calmly and accurately about Paxlovid.
First, everyone should appreciate that there was very little testing of the short- and long-term safety of this product, exactly what happened with COVID vaccines. Really good testing of a new drug should take many months or even years.
Here are brief summary statements about this new product:
It was approved by the FDA without any external meetings, serious reviews of test data or opportunity for public input. Pretty much all the regulatory work was done behind closed doors. Terrific for Pfizer. Bad for the public.
Of importance, note that in the trials only 21% of people had a comorbidity, while in reality 94% of COVID deaths have at least one comorbidity, and the average number of underlying medical conditions is four.
As to antiviral science, protease enzymes must be present for the virus to successfully infect by completing the cycle before taking the cell over. Paxlovid or any drug classified as a “protease inhibitor” will inhibit or decrease the protease enzyme interfering with the virus. Paxlovid blocks the 3CLPro protease from chopping up the long protein into pieces. The virus can’t separate out which pieces to cut out and assemble. It can’t make copies of itself. The COVID infection quickly stops.
Contrary to what the government says, ivermectin is the most successful and proven protease inhibitor in use worldwide. Just as with Paxlovid, ivermectin decreases the protease enzyme – but there are benefits of ivermectin in COVID treatment that are not present in Paxlovid. Additional actions of ivermectin include anti-coagulant action and anti-inflammatory actions, both observed in COVID infections. And, ivermectin has been safely used for decades. There have been many medical studies as well as clinical results showing its antiviral and anti-inflammatory effectiveness.
Paxlovid requires combination with an HIV/AIDS drug, Ritonavir, preventing the breakdown of the Paxlovid so it may inhibit or decrease the enzyme interrupting the viral life cycle. Ritonavir acts as a booster for Paxlovid, keeping it active inside a person’s body. Ritonavir also has its own black box warning and side effects, including life-threatening liver, pancreas and heart issues. Does the public really want to take an HIV/AIDS drug?
A course of the treatment is 20 Paxlovid pills and 10 ritonavir pills taken over five days. Taking six pills daily can pose challenges for many elderly people in particular.
According to Pfizer’s press release, for people with proven COVID infection, Paxlovid reduces hospitalization/death by 89% when taken within three days of symptom onset. So in the treatment group there were five of 697 hospitalized with no deaths compared to 44/682 hospitalized with nine subsequent deaths.
Think about that: This drug combo must be taken within three days of symptom onset. Here are critical problems facing ordinary people: How can you accurately identify COVID symptoms from similar symptoms from the flu or a bad cold; how can you get a fast test; how can you get in touch with your doctor within just a day or two and decide whether you really have COVID (don’t have drug interactions) and if so get a prescription; how can you get the prescription filled quickly? None of these are easy to address and overcome. All this makes this new combo medicine unrealistic and impractical for nearly everyone.
Also reported was an approximate 10-fold decrease in viral load at day 5, relative to placebo, indicating robust activity against SARS-CoV-2 and representing (supposedly) the strongest viral load reduction reported to date for a COVID-19 oral antiviral agent.
How interesting it would have been to test the Pfizer drug against an ivermectin protocol.
For example, how does the Pfizer drug compare with the Dr. George Fareed and Dr. Brian Tyson protocol? Well, Fareed and Tyson had many more patients (about 7,000) taking the drug combo and yet they had fewer hospitalizations (4) and the same number of deaths (0). So, you’re way better off with the Fareed and Tyson protocol. And the safety protocol of ivermectin after billions of uses globally is far better proven than for the Pfizer product.
For a good discussion on how ivermectin compares to Paxlovid see this article – especially on scientific evidence of ivermectin’s ability to block 3CL protease.
In terms of safety, the most common side effects reported during treatment and up to 34 days after the last dose of Paxlovid were dysgeusia (taste disturbance), diarrhea and vomiting. But what more serious side effects may turn up months or years later?
Paxlovid must not be used with certain other medicines, either because due to its action it may lead to harmful increases in their blood levels, or because conversely some medicines may reduce the activity of Paxlovid itself. The list of medicines that must not be used with Paxlovid is included in the proposed conditions for use. That list includes a very large number of drugs and supplements used by many millions of people, including, for example, Lipitor and St. John’s Wort. Also, Paxlovid must not be used in patients with severely reduced kidney or liver function.
As to availability, Pfizer CEO Bourla recently said the company can manufacture 80 million courses in 2022, with 30 million available in the first half of the year. That is not enough to serve many millions of Americans coming down with symptoms and a positive test result.
Tens of thousands of the pills will ship in the U.S. before the end of 2021, and hundreds of thousands more are expected at the beginning of 2022, a Pfizer spokesperson told the Wall Street Journal. The U.S. government is paying Pfizer $5.3 billion for 10 million treatment courses that will be delivered by the end of next year, according to the paper. Will medical insurance cover $530 per course?
Always follow the money. A month ago, SVB Leerink analyst Geoffrey Porges projected the drug will generate $24.2 billion in 2022 sales. Together with the company’s megablockbuster COVID-19 vaccine, Pfizer could be looking at $50 billion in peak pandemic vaccine and drug sales, Cantor Fitzgerald analyst Louise Chen wrote earlier this month. No surprise that some top Pfizer executives have become billionaires.
When it comes to COVID treatment, do you want to do what is right for you, or terrific for Pfizer?
MUST WATCH: Dr. Robert Malone Drops BOMBSHELLS During Much-Anticipated Interview With Joe Rogan – Says Federal Government is “Lawless” and Actively “Violating the Nuremberg Code”
Joe Rogan’s much-anticipated podcast interview with Dr. Robert Malone, the Inventor of mRNA vaccine technology, dropped on Friday – and sure enough, it did not disappoint.
Dr. Malone has been speaking out against the public health bureaucracy’s Covid-19 response and the experimental vaccines for months, proving himself to be one of the most reliable sources of factual information throughout the pandemic.
During his interview on JRE, Dr. Malone dropped bombshell after bombshell on the corrupt establishment – From public officials covering up known early treatments – to serious conflicts of interest between the medical elites and those who are supposedly holding them accountable – all the way up to federal cash bribes to healthcare facilities in exchange for Covid death receipts – he did not hold back.
“Our government is out of control on this [Covid response] and they are lawless. They completely disregard bioethics. They completely disregard the federal common rule.
These mandates of an experimental vaccine are explicitly illegal. They are explicitly inconsistent with the Nuremberg code. They are explicitly inconsistent with the Bellmont Report. They are flat-out illegal and they don’t care.
Hopefully, we are going to stop them before they take our kids.”
It’s no wonder Twitter PERMANENTLY banned him in a shameless attempt to get ahead of this interview.
Granted, much of what Dr. Malone revealed to Rogan had already been reported by outlets like the Gateway Pundit and The War Room, but the massive audience who listens to the JRE experience will be hearing it for the first time.
An awestruck Joe Rogan surely got the message, as he put it to Dr. Malone:
“That is crazy, That is so crazy to even hear.I think we are at a 45-degree downward angle heading into a mountain, I really do.
It’s so strange to me that no one is up in arms about this – other than the few people who have been censored and the few people who have these opposing viewpoints that are deemed to be something that can’t be discussed.”
The full interview is over 3 hours long, so here are a few of the best and most important parts – courtesy of Twitter user MythinformedMKE.
First up, Dr. Malone breaks down the federal government’scash-for-Covid “death benefits” for hospitals, which incentivizes healthcare providers to artificially inflate the infection and death count.
Unbelievably, hospitals can receive as muchas a $30,000 bonusfor placing a patient on a ventilator, and they are eligible to receive even more cash if the patient is declared dead with the virus, regardless of if it contributed to their death or not.
In short, the healthier the patients get – the less bonus money they receive. Seems a little backward, no?
“The numbers are quite large. There is something like a $3,000 basically death benefit to a hospital if it [a patient admission] can be claimed to be Covid.
There is a financial incentive to call somebody covid positive.The hospitals receive a bonus from the government – I think it’s like $3,000 – if someone is hospitalized and able to be declared Covid positive.
They also receive a bonus – I think the total is something like $30,000 incentive – if somebody gets put on the vent [ventilator].
Then they get a bonus if somebody is declared dead with Covid.
The CDC made the determination that they were going to make a core assumption – if [someone is] PCR positive, and [they] die, that is death due to Covid.
So, the extreme example just to show the absurdity: if the patient comes in with a bullet hole to the head and they do a nose swab and they come up PCR positive, they’re determined to have died from Covid.”
Dr. Malone also spoke about several serious conflicts of interest between the vaccine manufacturers and left-wing media fact-checkers.
Specifically – Thompson-Reuters. The outlet has become the primary ‘fact-checker’ for large platforms like Twitter, which have been cracking down on so-called ‘medical misinformation’ – especially concerning the experimental vaccines.
The only problem is that Pfizer and Thompson-Reuters have shared corporate ownership, which is a problem when a large majority of the information they are verifying as true or false – and therefore able to be disseminated among the masses – is directly tied to both of their bottom lines.
“Thompson-Reuters is tied to Pfizer,they have common corporate ownership and they are the ‘fact-checker’ of Twitter – they are integrated.
So, Thompson-Reuters is making the decision, which has connections to Pfizer, about what information will be allowed to be discussed on Twitter.”
Next, Dr. Malone touches on the ‘natural immunity’ discussion. As has been proven by volumes of data – both over the years and even specifically related to Covid – individuals who recover naturally and acquire natural immunity are much better protected than if they were to just take a manufactured vaccine – especially when it comes to these experimental mRNA vaccines that have shown a sharp decline in immunity that eventually will leave the individual more susceptible to catching the virus than their unvaccinated peers.
According to Dr. Malone, there are also now concerns that those with natural immunity are actually more likely to experience an adverse reaction from the vaccines than those who have never been infected with Covid.
“It’s very clear that people who have natural immunity have a much higher risk factor for this whole spectrum of adverse events if they get jabbed.
There is a number of things here that are not supported ‘by the science’ – to put it gently. [But] since we are on the Joe Rogan show, I can speak freely, it’s nucking futz. This is just wrong.”
One of the most shocking bombshells from Dr. Malone came when he was discussing the Uttar Pradesh province in India, which has has some of the greatest success against Covid-19 out of any area in the world thanks to their rapid deployment of early treatment care packages that included several drugs to combat the virus.
Despite the success of the early treatments that were distributed across the province with the help of the WHO, the drugs used in the care packages have not been officially disclosed by the Indian government to the rest of the world (although, Ivermectin has been reported to be one of the drugs that were used).
According to Dr. Malone, India’s decision was apparently made at the behest of Joe Biden, who personally visited with the country’s prime minister just before they decided not to disclose the treatments.
“Uttar Pradesh, as you know, has crushed Covid. It’s not clear what are the drugs [they used]. What we do know is there was a decision made [as] the virus was just ripping through Uttar Pradesh, which has the same population as the United States.
The composition has not been formally disclosed. It was done in coordination with the WHO, and whatever was in those packages was rumored to include ivermectin.
But there was a specific visit of Biden to Modi [the PM of India] and a decision was made [by] the Indian government not to disclose the contents of those packages that were being deployed in Uttar Pradesh.
They [the medical packages] are still there, and Uttar Pradesh has flatlined right now. The rest of the world is yelling about Omicron and hospitalizations, but Uttar Pradesh is still flatlined in terms of deaths.
There was a meeting between Joe Biden and Modi.All I know is that immediately afterward there was a decision not to disclose the contents of what was being deployed in Uttar Pradesh.”
It was never about saving lives. A similar issue about the concealment of working prospective treatments for Covid-19 was raised earlier this month by the world-renowned cardiologist Dr. Peter McCullough when he sounded the alarm over the US public health bureaucracy purposefully suppressed treatments in order to push the experimental vaccines – also on Joe Rogan’s show.
Finally, Rogan and Dr. Malone discuss the mass censorship of unapproved speech that is ramping up on Big Tech platforms. Rogan blasts Twitter for censoring even the most qualified among us just because they say something that goes against the narrative before turning the mic over to Dr. Malone to discuss his recent ban from the platform and the terrible consequences that arise when crushing free speech and an open discussion
Those are just some of the most important highlights of many. Once again, the entire 3+ hour podcast is well worth the listen. The full episode of JRE with Dr. Robert Malone (with video) can be found on Spotify, here.
Federal Judge Halts Biden’s Vax And Mask Mandate For Head Start Programs
Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton scored what he considered to be a “win for the children of Texas” after a federal judge ruled against vaccine and mask mandates for Head Start programs initiated by the Biden administration.
The ruling from Judge James “Wesley” Hendrix of the U.S. District Court Northern District of Texas orders a halt in required COVID-19 protocol conditions for the funding of Head Start programs.
The new rules issued last month require children over 2 in Head Start programs to wear masks, while the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services is requiring staff, contractors and volunteers in the program to be vaccinated by the end of January.
Texas argued that the act did not authorize mandates.
Per the ruling, Texas leaders including Gov. Greg Abbott argue that the Act “does not authorise such mandates, that irreparable injury would result from them that [the Department of Health and Human Services] failed to comply with the Administrative Procedure Act in adopting the conditions, and that the mandates violate various Constitutional doctrines.”
The court agreed with these arguments, finding that there is a likelihood the mandates do not fit within the Head Start Act’s authorisation and that the mandates are “arbitrary and capricious,” so it has preliminary enjoined their enforcement across Texas.
Texas AG Ken Paxton celebrated it on Twitter:
Texas Governor Greg Abbott responded by saying “Texas just beat Biden again.”